Key Labour Law Insights

Allahabad (Uttar Pradesh)

  • Liabilities may be fastened on contractors once engagement of contract labour is established: Case of N.T.P.C. Ltd. v. Union of India and Others (Allahabad)

 

Calcutta

  • Principal employer is liable for wages if the contractor fails to pay his workers: Case of Bharat Cooking Coal Ltd. & Anr. v. Aloka Mahato & Ors. (Calcutta)

 

Delhi

  • Conditions of service can be changed only after 21 days' notice: Case of A. Radhika v. M/s. Wishwa Prakashan Publishers and Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi)
  • Full back wages to a workman having lost confidence of the management, is perverse: Case of Central Warehousing Corporation v. Madan Mohan (Delhi)
  • Fraudulent transaction of money for self-gains by a worker is a grave misconduct: Case of Central Warehousing Corporation v. Madan Mohan (Delhi)
  • Exemption under Bonus Act is available only for non-profit establishments: Case of Batra Hospital Employees Union v. Batra Hospital & Medical Research (Delhi)
  • Even a part-time employee is entitled to gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972: Case of Savita Gulati v. Directorate of Education & Anr. (Delhi)
  • Probationer has no right to be regularised against the wishes of the management: Case of Ashok Kumar v. The Director, Banarsidas Chandiwala Institute of Professional Studies & Anr. (Delhi)
  • An employer not to hold an enquiry in misconduct resulting in ‘loss of confidence’: Case of Delhi State Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. v. Sh. Badan Singh (Delhi)
  • Internal Committee can extend the delay of complaint by recording reasons: Case of Tejinder Kaur v. Union of India and Others (Delhi)

 

Gauhati (Assam)

  • Transfer of an employee not by competent authority is rightly quashed: Case of Indian Tea and Provision Limited v. Rajib Saikia (Gauhati)

 

 

Gujarat

  • No relief on termination if the workman has not served for 240 days: Case of Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation v. Anil Budhabhai Vegad (Gujarat)

 

Himachal Pradesh

  • Adjudicator has to decide a reference but cannot question its maintainability: Case of Sansar Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Another (Himachal Pradesh)

 

Jammu & Kashmir

  • Labour Court also exercises the power and jurisdiction of a civil court: Case of M/s Manu Mohit Industries v. State of J&K and Others (Jammu & Kashmir)

 

Karnataka

  • Prosecution of factory's Director and Manager untenable when company is not impleaded as accused: Case of Sri. Ramesh Mehra and Others v. Sri. Umesh and Another (Karnataka)
  • No earned leave on reinstatement: Case of The General Manager, Vijay Bank v. H.C. Jayaprakash (Karnataka)
  • An employer is not liable to remit EPF contributions of its employees if the Act is not applicable: Case of Enforcement Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation v. Vishvabharathi Education Society (Karnataka)
  • A union leader must be a role model of integrity and law abiding: Case of Krishnappa M. v. Bharat Electronics Ltd. (Karnataka)
  • No person shall be prosecuted and punished twice for the same offence: Case of Suman Saurabh v. Internal Complaints Committee Hewlett Packard Global Soft Pvt. Ltd. (Karnataka)

 

Kerala

  • Owner of a hotel can also be treated as employee for coverage under ESI Act: Case of F. Basheer v. The Regional Director, Employees State Insurance Corporation (Kerala)

 

Madhya Pradesh

  • E.P.F.O. has to prove functional integrality for clubbing of more than one unit: Case of Mahakoushal Gasolene Enterprises v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Madhya Pradesh)
  • Service condition of workman can't be changed during pendency of industrial dispute: Case of Peb Steel Lloyd (India) Ltd. v. Nitin Sonwane (Madhya Pradesh)

 

Madras (Tamil Nadu)

  • Right to demonstration by the workers is subject to reasonable restrictions: Case of Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga Uzhiyargal Matrum Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam v. Commissioner of Labour, Chennai and Others (Madras)
  • A person, who issues charge sheet, can also be presenting officer in the enquiry: Case of The Management ELGI Equipments Ltd. v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore and Others (Madras)
  • Apprentices being paid basic and dearness pay etc. will be covered under the EPF Act: Case of M/s. First Garments Manufacturing Company (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. The Presiding Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal and Another (Madras)
  • Damages and interest to be attracted for belated payment without sufficient cause under the EPF Act: Case of The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/s. Hivelm Industries and Another (Madras)

 

Orissa

  • Criminal proceedings under the Payment of Wages Act for implementation of the award are not tenable: Case of M/s. Ruchika Social Service Organisation, Bhubaneswar v. Binaya Kumar Suar (Orissa)

 

Punjab & Haryana

  • Abandonment is an intention of the workmen to leave service: Case of Harjit Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Patiala (Punjab & Haryana)
  • Record if not produced in Labour Court can't be produced in writ petition: Case of The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India and Another v. Mr. Santosh and Another (Punjab & Haryana)
  • Three companies running in one premises rightly clubbed for coverage under the EPF Act: Case of Central Board of Trustees through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Vajra Golden Lion Canteen (Punjab & Haryana)
  • Disciplinary Authority is empowered to reject the enquiry report: Case of Surinder Singh v. General Manager, Personnel and Administration, Escorts Mahle Ltd. (Punjab & Haryana)

 

Rajasthan

  • Privileged leave cannot be claimed by an employee as a matter of right: Case of Smt. Shashi Bala Meena v. Punjab National Bank and Others (Rajasthan)
  • Maternity leave can't be denied to an employee merely because consolidated salary was paid to her: Case of Dr. (Smt.) Hemlata Saraswat v. State of Rajasthan (Rajasthan)

 

Supreme Court of India

  • Settlement, unless more beneficial for workers, cannot override certified standing orders: Case of Bharatiya Kamgar Karmachari Mahasangh v. M/s. Jet Airways Ltd. (Supreme Court)
  • Claim for overtime tenable only when additional work is admitted by employer: Case of Currency Note Press & Anr. v. N.N. Sardesai & Ors. (Supreme Court)