Recent Labor Law Judgments (2024)

Recent Labor Law Judgments (2024)

Kerala High Court

  • Private WhatsApp Chats: Employee’s private WhatsApp group chats are not grounds for disciplinary action.
  • Mere Apology: An apology from an employee does not imply an admission of guilt.
  • Intentional Murder and Compensation: Intentional murder by an employee does not qualify for accident compensation. 
  • Date of Birth Change Post-Retirement: Employees cannot change their date of birth after retirement. 
  • Basic Wages and Allowances: Employers cannot object to considering certain allowances as basic wages later. 
  • Responsibility and Punishment: Punishment cannot be interfered with solely because it was not the employee’s responsibility to perform certain tasks. 

Delhi High Court

  • Disciplinary Proceedings and Superannuation: Disciplinary actions cannot extend beyond the age of superannuation. 
  • Industrial Dispute Location: Employees can only raise disputes in the courts at their place of transfer. 
  • Compensation Commissioner Orders: High Courts cannot be approached against orders from the Compensation Commissioner. 
  • Pre-Deposit of Damages: Tribunals cannot mandate pre-deposit of damages during appeals. 
  • Defreezing Bank Accounts: High Courts can order defreezing of bank accounts to ensure payment of employee salaries. 
  • Unemployment Proof: Proving unemployment is challenging as a negative fact cannot be established. 

Calcutta High Court

  • Supervisor Definition: Handling administrative work independently and providing completion reports qualifies one as a supervisor. 
  • Trainee Gratuity: Trainees are considered employees for gratuity purposes, unlike apprentices. 
  • Office Relocation: Management is not required to notify changes in service conditions for office relocation. 
  • Differing Opinions in Enquiry: Conflicting views between the disciplinary authority and enquiry officer can invalidate the enquiry. 
  • Absorption and Gratuity: Absorption after training does not disrupt service continuity for gratuity.
  • Interest on Gratuity: Employees are entitled to interest on delayed gratuity payments even without a specific claim. 
  • Madras High Court
  • Leave Encashment: Employees must receive leave encashment as it is considered part of their salary. 
  • Contractual Employment: Long-term contract work does not guarantee a right to regular employment. 
  • Society Business Disputes: Disputes related to the business of a society cannot be mixed with employment disputes. 
  • PF Account Inactivity: No interest is accrued on a provident fund account once it becomes inactive.
  • Recovery of Money: The Assistant Labour Commissioner can enforce recovery of money due to workers under a settlement. 

Telangana High Court

  • PoSH Act Appeals: Appeal provisions under the PoSH Act and Rules are valid and not in conflict with each other. 
  • Accounts Executive Classification: An Accounts Executive is not considered a 'workman' under Section 2(s) of the ID Act. 
  • CLRA Act Violations: Violations of the CLRA Act result in penal consequences rather than regularization. 
  • Parity with Reengaged Employees: Employees cannot claim parity with those reengaged for implementing a labor court award. 
  • EPF Act and Trainees: Trainees receiving wages are considered employees under the EPF Act. 
  • Company Clubbing: Clubbing of companies is valid if one is a 100% owned subsidiary of the other. 

Bombay High Court

  • Contract Employment: Working on a contract basis for a long period does not confer a right to regular employment. 
  • Retrospective Pension Contributions: Employers cannot make retrospective contributions beyond statutory limits to pension funds after retirement. 
  • Funding and BOCW Act Prosecution: Funding status does not influence criminal prosecution under the BOCW Act. 
  • Cooperative Societies and Maternity Benefits: Cooperative societies are included under the Maternity Benefit Act. 

Karnataka High Court

  • Date of Birth and Retirement: Changing the date of birth post-retirement is not permitted. 
  • EPF Act and Establishment Heads: The President and Secretary of an establishment are not classified as employees under the EPF Act. 
  • Defreezing Bank Accounts: Employers can represent before EPF authorities for defreezing bank accounts. 
  • Show Cause Notices: Show cause notices for recovery of dues cannot be challenged if not initially contested. 

Jharkhand High Court

  • CLRA Act Violations: Violations lead to penalties rather than regularization. 
  • EPFO Limitation Period: Limitation for EPFO orders is calculated from the date of knowledge when the order was not shared. 

Himachal Pradesh High Court

  • Trustee Powers: Only the CGIT, not solely the Board of Trustees, can reduce damages. 
  • EPF Act and Orphanages: Messes run by orphanages fall under the EPF Act. 

Orissa High Court

  • Absorption of Casual Workers: Industrial Tribunals, not Writ Courts, can direct absorption of casual workers. 
  • Unemployment Proof: It is presumed that workmen have worked continuously unless proven otherwise. 
  • Suspension Consideration: Authorities must consider applications for suspension even in sexual harassment cases. 

Punjab and Haryana High Court

  • Cess Act Reimbursement: There is no restriction on agreeing to reimburse statutory liabilities under the Cess Act. 
  • Provident Fund Deductions: Principal employers must ensure provident fund deductions if contractors lack PF accounts. 

Patna High Court

  • Summons Issuance: Summons against the occupier can only be issued after establishing a prima facie violation of the Factories Act.